FlowingData Forums » Data Visualization

Flare vs Processing

Started 2 years ago by kfor / 4 posts

  1. Nathan's tutorial on using Flare for something like the JobVoyager was a real eye-opener for me, didn't realize that there were tools available to make interactive visualization so easy.

    I whipped something up real fast ( http://staff.washington.edu/kfor/USCoD.swf ), and now I'm hooked. But before I devote too much time to learning a new language, I want to make sure I've picked the 'right' one.

    Flare is of course beautiful, and has a lot of pre-written code specifically for visualizing data that I can borrow from. But it seems to be dead development wise and there don't seem to be any new resources popping up for it.

    Processing looks like it's easier to learn, but it requires a Java applet which limits who will use it. And there doesn't seem to be as much code that I can just adapt to my own needs, as most of the stuff I've seen is more artistic than data-driven. But it certainly seems to have a more active user community than Flare.

    I eventually want to create something like the cause of death voyager I posted above, but with the ability to select any country, have inset graphs that show the age pattern of a disease when you hover over the main graph, allow for pulling up multiple countries for comparison, etc. Does anyone have suggestions for which would be the best language for me to learn over Christmas? Also, any links to tutorials or other resources to get started would be great!

    Thanks
    Kyle

  2. Hi kfor, very nice. I'm glad the tutorial was put to use :).

    Processing is a programming language while Flare is a visualization framework that is implemented in Actionscript. So really it should be a question of Actionscript vs Processing. Just like Processing has lots of libraries, Actionscript has lots of libraries, and Flare is one of them.

    Anyways, it mostly comes down to what you want to use your visualization for.

    This thread should help:

    http://forums.flowingdata.com/topic/processing-vs-flash

  3. Thanks, Nathan. I think that in the long run Actionscript will have a better return on investment since I can potentially use it for so many other projects, so I think I'll go with that.

    And after reading up more on its ability to handle huge datasets ( http://www.cynergysystems.com/blogs/page/andrewtrice?entry=visualizing_large_data_sets ) I'm confident it'll be able to handle what I intend to throw at it.

    On the topic of libraries, are there any other AS libraries that are particularly useful for these sorts of projects?

  4. Modest Maps is really good for geographic data: http://modestmaps.com


Reply

You must log in to post.

About this Topic